If there was a stage-alter in BFO bias, are you currently considering it may be about 10 models and we should subtract 10 in the documented BFO’s to approximate this actions (if it transpired)? That is apparently the approx. bias during the 30S route. Would you be expecting Channel C bias (the phone simply call channel) to drift in the exact same quantity?
Because you informed us you’re around the spectrum I fully grasp. But please make an effort to choose another point of view Every now and then.
I thought you described it just fine. Anything you and DrB have not accomplished is think of a variety (including the multiplicative outcomes in the geometry, PDOP).
We don’t know how the flaperon’s failures and destruction occured. There’s even now no official report on this difficulty. All harm though In particular combined with the outboard flap part (as well as other located pieces) point out very low influence velocity damage and seperation on effects Together with the water area.
Victor Iannello suggests: January four, 2018 at five:00 pm @DennisW: Be careful about trusting the many statements built during the media reviews. 1st, the price could possibly depend upon where the debris subject is found. For illustration, if Seabed Constructor rushes for the spot exactly where CSIRO’s David Griffin expects the particles field to get, and is successful there, Probably OI doesn’t get paid about whether it is identified at 27S, As an example.
Does anybody have an educated watch on why the simulator may have finished this? And irrespective of whether There's a real-lifestyle risk this may well manifest? The rationale which i talk to is usually that it offers a feasible situation for Restoration from a steep bank and ongoing flight past ~25NM of 7th arc.
I never ever revealed everything on four>, but we (you and I) did chat about this briefly. I did publish a lot on 5> but took it down simply because I had been not able to answer thoughts raised by past operate colleagues. Nobody right here requested any questions about it, so I didn't come to feel bad about stepping faraway from it.
However, thinking about the three simulations Mike completed, all exhibit a failed motor restart from the still left engine. For that case through which the still left motor unsuccessful very first, the unsuccessful restart of the remaining engine transpired although the ideal engine (and TAC) was still functioning, so there was no impact on the flight attitude.
Victor Iannello claims: January eight, 2018 at nine:twelve pm @sk999: If the orbit is round but inclined, and the worth in the inclination, ascending node, and longitude utilized by the AES were being precise (which they might’t be a result of the confined resolution), then the AES payment are going to be great. Which was The premise of the BFO spoofing scenario I formulated a while ago.
If I remember appropriately, ALSM had insisted the AES simply would not transmit if it didn't have the demanded navigational info enter. Your write-up previously mentioned suggests that Holland’s revised paper reveals that it works by using a special/secondary BFO algorithm in these kinds of an instance
Great question. The solution lies in simultaneously fitting the BFOs and BTOs though setting up with the last radar keep track of ailments of speed and program. As We've reviewed numerous situations, you don’t require a SLOP to suit the BTOs if you are ready to alter the time of the final radar Speak to by 2 minutes to eighteen:24:twelve.
Obviously I am paranoid about the location of your seventh arc. It is the only error I am able to think of that could defeat OI’s seek out the plane. I'm a large supporter with the terminus becoming near the arc.
If this easy to recall waypoint was established it might imply it was established deliberately also. But with see post what objective? There's nothing certain at 40S100E.
Against this, Ocean Infinity seems anonymous like a reasonably critical mob. Its Web site describes the corporation as “ocean explorers mapping the unfamiliar”.